Inside NetX: infrastructure, BSC products & separate trading

R1 6EC153: upper funding graph ··· NetX provisioning (same NetX address).
R4 2cca: Polygon deployment ··· Polygon payment execution (same contract).
R5 f97f: Morph bootstrap ··· Morph payment execution (same contract; also in legacy authority).

R2 AbD2: upper graph ··· NetX provisioning ··· Morph bootstrap. NetX and Morph balances are separate. ··· testnet faucet admin (separate chain).
R3 EC7908: upper graph ··· Morph bootstrap. Same address across chains, NOT a bridge leg. ··· Morph v2 deployment and return recipient.
R6 d203: Morph bootstrap ··· Morph relayer (same chain) ··· Polygon relayer (separate chain). ··· funds Morph v2 relayer.

R7 3534: Polygon payer ··· Morph payer. Same address, separate orders. ··· BSC funding recipient ··· TESTNET staking participant; not one asset flow.
R8 292A: Polygon recipient ··· Morph recipient. Same address, merchant identity unproven.
R9 fa370: BSC funding ··· Polygon deployer. Address correspondence only, NOT bridged BNB/POL.
Dotted keys have NO direction and create NO funding, settlement or control route. Official wallets remain unlinked.

Solid amount arrows show observed transfers; security arrows show technical authority, not money movement.
Gate sent 99.318 POL to Polygon deployer fa370, not to the router. Creation value was zero.
BSC b67a sent the same fa370 address 0.01 BNB; no movement of this lot to Polygon is established.

6EC153 funded bcA918; three native batches provided 104 NETX to 120 addresses.
The second 100-NETX funding came after the initial batch. Do not call all 250 NETX pre-funding.
AbD2 supplied four locally deployed token inventories. USDC/USDT labels here are not official stablecoins.

24 Sep: same payer 3534, relayer d203 and recipient 292A on Polygon and Morph.
Each sponsorPay moved 0.0066 USDC directly payer to recipient, not through router balances.
Two orders, 11m33s apart; 0.0132 USDC total. Do not count execution arrows as more volume.

Deployments, funding and administrative roles support a project connection for the bridge, TH and operational core. Individual identities and common team ownership are not independently proven.
Funded recipients and contract users are transaction-linked participants, NOT automatically team-controlled wallets. An address being on NetX is not evidence of team ownership.
The separately bounded trading system has NO proven team affiliation or official market-making/multi-client mandate.
120-address activity strongly fits coordinated testing, not evidence of 120 independent customers.
Repeated addresses across panels are the same address on the labelled chain, not additional wallets.

No continuous Gate → router → 120-address asset flow or Polygon/Morph → NetX settlement is established.
No common legal owner, exchange-account owner, named merchant, Lawson/NETSTARS link or NETX-demand conclusion.
Infrastructure evidence through 9 Oct; declared-wallet state checked 10 Oct 2026. Pins vary by branch; not a fresh all-network audit. Transaction proofs: companion README.

Network not stated in official announcement. These are declared wallet roles, not a confirmed network assignment.
20 Sep: four full addresses were published in an image, omitted from the generated secondary summary.
10 Oct: all four have zero native balance / nonce / code on NetX, BSC, Polygon and Morph; BSC NETX = 0.
NetX/BSC/Morph reviewed indices are empty. Polygon history is blocked; no cluster link established.
The source plans staged allocations. Liquidity support is not proof of trading or a market-maker mandate.

AbD2 deployed faucet3ddd and granted claim role to bcA918.
3534 received a mock-token faucet claim, then made two successful AgentCity stakes totaling 3 tNETX.
2aba made two other stakes totaling 2 tNETX. Four calls / 5 tNETX combined; not all by3534.
AgentCity mission creation and a matching NodeSettled event are testnet execution, not production NETX demand.

Included: infrastructure, parallel payments, AgentCity TESTNET, declarations, BSC migration/deposits/allocations and separately investigated trading.
Trading has a separate boundary and NO directional link to project administration. Shared exchange custody is not common control.
Detailed governance, every recipient and complete lifetime administrative histories remain in linked research; this is NOT a fresh all-network audit.

R12 b67a: infrastructure gas funder ··· migration administrator ··· July/August gas funder. Same BSC address, separate actions.
R14 4A: TH/TT payout ··· NXL redemption. R15 47e8: NXL/Genesis/V3 owner ··· NFT payment receiver.
R16 34d527: NFT proceeds ··· August NETX return. Deposit/sweep-like behavior is inference, NOT project-owned trading infrastructure.
R17 50867: trading authority ··· sale inventory ··· reverse purchase inventory. No bridge to the project cluster is asserted.

b67a deployed TT/TH/4A/8ee5. Four deposit versions have separate observed owner/verifier roles; do not collapse all keys.
NXL intake and NETX payout match exact user, amount and order ID. The dashed match is an EVENT CORRESPONDENCE, NOT a token transfer or contract call.
42 matched NXL paths /39 redeemer addresses paid 8,024.427248450624882664 NETX;46 inspected claim signatures recover1494. Eleven known orders remain unmatched/unused, not proven failures.
August TH:240,972 unique TH;207,638 resulting NETX reached Gate via four relays. Gate deposits confirmed; subsequent sales and account ownership unproven.

June/July/August executors each received443,834 NETX from Gate. b67a funded July/August gas only. Coordinated allocation ledger is a strong inference; vesting/compensation category is unproven.
August:150,000 NETX returned through34d527;293,833 went to non-Gate recipients;1 remained. Repeated hops are not extra supply.
GenesisBundle owner forwarded8,560 NFT USDT plus0.00016 separate dust through34d527 to Gate. Count8,560.00016 USDT once.
Shared Gate/MEXC or34d527 usage does NOT identify common beneficial ownership or a post-deposit sale.

6011 owns72ef proxy administrator;72ef controls50867 upgrades within its observed runtime window. At least8 keys have execution/withdraw access, NOT8 upgrade owners.
Confirmed: NETX sales AND reverse purchases, multi-asset conversion, Gate/MEXC routing. This is not evidence of only one-way disposal.
UNPROVEN: NetX-team ownership/control, official market-maker mandate, profitability, intentional price suppression or exchange-account ownership.
The other watched055a/218c/B769 systems are NOT placed under6011 authority. Production Polygon/Morph → NetX/AgentCity settlement also remains unproven.

Inside NetX: infrastructure, BSC products & separate trading | 10 Oct 2026